Heather Hiestand's Musings

Controversy and romance fiction

Print the article

This entry was posted on 12/4/2006 10:54 AM and is filed under On Books.

   I saw The Da Vinci Code on DVD this weekend, which has at its heart a religious controversy. Coincidentally I started reading Cross Bones by Kathy Reichs a few days ago as well. As always, the Reichs plots focus on bones of some kind, and this book has possible Jesus Christ bones. These plots brought to mind one of my unpublished manuscripts. I had pressure from my critique partners to remove the religious comments, inappropriately-timed of course, of one of my characters. This made me wonder when my little fiction circle decided to go politically correct, as it were. My manuscript is a romance novel. Are we supposed to avoid controversy as romance novelists? Are we afraid of the hate mail I would imagine Dan Brown and Kathy Reichs received by the bag-full? Do they make enough at their publishing level to hire protection from lawyers and publicists that someone like me down at the bottom of the literary food chain cannot?
   On the other hand, we have no problem in romance with bad cops, bad bosses and bad husbands. Aren't we afraid of their hate mail? Of course we have lots of good cops, husbands (maybe not so much good bosses) in romance fiction. Maybe that should protect us. But we have plenty of Christian fiction books too, balancing out my inappropriate characters.
   When, if ever, does romance fiction cross the line? Is it bad taste to bring religion into the characterization of an annoying character, or am I simply playing it too safe? Why is it that these big novelists' controversies are entertainment, and mine are no-nos that aren't worth keeping?
   Food for thought when religion is ever present, especially in this holiday season.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 12/4/2006 6:30 PM Eilis Flynn wrote:
      But haven't I heard that publicity in any form is useful? Did Stephen King avoid putting in the crazed mother in Carrie because he was afraid of getting flak? Was the religion in your work making a point or did you put it in just for the heck of it? Be true to your vision!
      Reply to this
    • 12/4/2006 9:28 PM david wrote:
      If the religious aspect of a character adds to the story and/or the character's complexity, I'd vote for it.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.